Wednesday, March 9, 2011

This is the Jewish Group that Brandeis Hillel Rejected

Here is the opening statement made by Jewish Voice for Peace in its bid to be recognized as a Jewish group under Hillel auspices. I think it is as important document because it shows the sort of group that has no place at the Hillel communal table. Let us not forget that Hillel was never intended to be the Zionist Organization of America. It was intended to be a place for Jewish students to interact with other Jewish students in a Jewish environment. At some point, however – was it when the former head of the Israel Coalition Campus became the Executive Director? – the mission changed. Hillel was also to serve as a center for political advocacy for Israel. As support for Israel has become more and more controversial, Hillel has decided to cut its ties with Jewish organizations that are Jewishly committed but that do not toe the party line.

I ask all my readers, Jewish and non-Jewish, whether the following statement reads like an illegitimate Jewish group. Because in rejecting the Jewish Voice for Peace, Brandeis Hillel has staked out what is legitimate and illegitimate in Jewish belief. Maimonides wrote a credo with thirteen principles. Hillel replaced that with one: Support Israel.

We are Jewish Voice for Peace and we are coming to Hillel tonight to become part of Brandeis Hillel, as full and equal members of the organized Jewish community. 

Motivated by our Jewish values and our belief in Ahavat Yisrael, we advocate for a just and lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. We believe that both peoples have a right to safety, security, human rights and full self-determination. We fully support the right of the Jewish and Palestinian people to live in their historic homeland.  We believe in the principle of non-violent peacemaking, and to that end we oppose terrorism and military force as strategies to accomplish political goals. 

The mission statement of the Brandeis Hillel constitution reads: "We… affirm the necessity of a pluralistic Jewish community on campus, with partisanship to none." In line with this, Jewish Voice for Peace strives for a pluralistic, welcoming, and inclusive Jewish community. We offer Brandeis' Jewish community an outlet for political views and ideologies that fall beyond the mainstream, and we allow students to grow intellectually by having an opportunity to expand and develop  their beliefs. JVP, like Hillel, pursues the Jewish values of tzedek and tikkun olam: we want to heal Israel's many wounds left by internal conflict and unnecessary violence while longing for justice and peace in the area.

There is an old joke about a man stranded on a desert island. When he is rescued years and years later, he shows his rescuers the two synagogues he constructed. "Why two?" They ask. "This is the synagogue I pray in," he says, "and this is the synagogue you wouldn't catch me dead in!" Internal divisions within the Jewish community have always existed. Jewish communal organizations should exist in order to foster healthy dialogue between these assorted political opinions. Excluding us from Hillel would serve to increase polarization, while bringing us in would allow for increased learning and co-operation among the Jewish community.

"
National Hillel declares that it "is steadfastly committed to the support of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state," We, too, support a democratic state in Eretz Yisrael based on Jewish values." We urge you to ask any questions so we may clear up misconceptions. Today, you as a Hillel board will make a powerful statement.  You can reject Jewish Voice for Peace, and indicate to the Brandeis community that Hillel is an exclusive institution, and that only those who fall in line politically are welcome. Or you can accept us, and signal to the world that Hillel is the true umbrella organization for the whole Jewish community; a pluralistic community, with partisanship to none.

5 comments:

  1. Even though I disagree with you about Brandeis Hillel's choice, I think this is something that should be discussed. You brought up a lot of good points.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let Brandeis Hillel dissolve its ties to Greater Hillel and resume the old Jewish Community model. Brandeis must have many young Jewish members who desire to conduct their politics OUTSIDE their religious community.

    If Brandeis (especially Brandeis!) Hillel cuts its ties, Greater Hillel might perform a course correction. Until then, good riddance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. no...this is the "jewish" group that hillel rejected

    From: "Jonathan M. Sussman"
    To: sds
    Subject: Goldstone Forum Action Planning - Wed. @ 10!
    Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:32:19 -0400 (EDT)

    Hey!

    As many of you know, Brandeis will be hosting a forum next Thursday, 11/5, to discuss the Goldstone Report, a report from the United Nations which determined that Israel used excessive force in its occupation of Gaza. Believe it or not, this was poorly received within the Zionist community. Thus Brandeis is hosting a forum between the report's author, international jurist Richard Goldstone, and former Israeli Ambassador to the UN, Dore Gold. Full details here: http://brandeis.edu/now/2009/october/goldstonegold.html.

    Many of us are concerned that this forum is inherently slanted, as it contrasts 'nuetral' international opinion with a wildly pro-Zionist message, excluding voices from the Palestinian community. In light of this, activists across campus will be meeting this Wednesday, 10/28 @ 10 PM in the Village C Lounge to discuss a possible response. Possibilities include inviting Palestinian speakers to come participate, seeding the audience with people who can disrupt the Zionist narrative, protest, and direct action.

    Please come and help us coordinate a response!

    F**k the occupation,
    Jon




    Jon Sussman is a leader of the jvp on the brandeis campus


    wanna tell us again how they believe in inclusion?

    ReplyDelete
  4. @bacci40

    Seems to me that the e-mail you shared is absolutely evidence that Mr. Sussman supports inclusion...of Palestinians. I can't see any evidence in the e-mail of him trying to exclude anyone from any conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. jaggedben

    as the purpose of the debate was to offer judge goldstone an opportunity to defend his report against one zionist...care to tell me the purpose of "seeding the audience with people who can disrupt the zionist narrative" means?

    did judge goldstone need assistance in defending his report?

    is dore gold so super scary that it takes an audience to combat his words?

    and no one was excluded from attending...and you know that.

    jvp wished to disrupt the proceedings...as they have other events.

    dont be obtuse.

    ReplyDelete